Top 10 Banned Films of the 20th Century

प्लागिअरिजेद फ्फ (plagiarized from: http://www.alternativereel.com/includes/top-ten/display_review.php?id=00091&list)

#10 - THE OUTLAW [1943]

Notable for bringing sex to the Western genre, Howard Hughes’ The Outlaw was shelved for years before finally receiving approval by the Hollywood Production Code Administration. The whole controversial production seems to have gone forward for one reason: To showcase actress Jane Russell’s magnificent breasts. The film’s slogan was "What are the two biggest reasons for Jane Russell’s success?" During filming, Hughes once commented, "We’re not getting enough production from Jane’s breasts." In her memorable screen debut, Russell portrayed "Rio McDonald." Oh yeah, The Outlaw also starrred Walter Huston (The Treasure of the Sierra Madre), Thomas Mitchell (It's a Wonderful Life) and Jack Buetel as "Billy the Kid."

#09 - ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT [1930]

Directed by Lewis Milestone, All Quiet on the Western Front was based on the critically acclaimed Erich Maria Remarque novel, Im Westen nichts Neues, and starred Lew Ayres as the disillusioned soldier, Paul Baumer. The film, which won an Academy Award for Best Picture, was eventually banned in Germany due to its anti-war theme: "You still think it's beautiful to die for your country. The first bombardment taught us better. When it comes to dying for country, it's better not to die at all." However, during the film's brief run in Germany, the Nazis released rats into the theaters to scare off movie patrons. All Quiet on the Western Front was also banned in Italy until 1956.

#08 - I AM CURIOUS (YELLOW) [1967]

Banned in Massachusetts for being pornographic, this notorious Swedish film (Jag är nyfiken - gul) faced a landmark court battle in the United States and was eventually found to be not obscene by the United States Court of Appeals. Directed by Vilgot Sjöman, the film starred Lena Nyman and is a companion film to I Am Curious (Blue) (1968). The films were named after the colors of the Swedish flag. I Am Curious (Yellow) contains documentary elements, including an interview with Martin Luther King, Jr.

#07 - THE BIRTH OF A NATION [1915]

Based on Thomas Dixon's novel, The Clansman, D. W. Griffith's controversial and extremely influential silent film classic caused riots in Boston, Philadelphia and other major cities. The NAACP organized protests at the various premieres of the film around the country. In addition, The Birth of a Nation was outright banned in several cities such as Chicago, Pittsburgh and Kansas City due to its racist themes. U.S. President Woodrow Wilson commented that the movie, which starred Lillian Gish and Mae Marsh, was "like writing history with lightning." Griffith's next silent film masterpiece, Intolerance, was made in reaction to the negative response he received from The Birth of a Nation.

#06 - THE TIN DRUM [1979]

"A savage, sweeping epic of society in chaos." Adapted from the critically acclaimed novel (Die Blechtrommel) by Günter Grass, The Tin Drum won the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film and the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival. However, the film was banned in several countries, including parts of Canada, as well as in Oklahoma City for a short time, due to a controversial scene that appears to show minors engaging in oral sex.

#05 - HAIL MARY [1985]

In Hail Mary (Je vous salue, Marie), the Virgin Mary is a gas station attendant whose boyfriend, Joseph, drives a taxi. Even Pope John Paul II jumped into the battle over this controversial, modern retelling of the virgin birth story from Jean-Luc Godard, claiming that the film "deeply wounds the religious sentiments of believers."

#04 - LAST TANGO IN PARIS [1973]

Directed by Bernardo Bertolucci, Last Tango in Paris (Ultimo tango a Parigi) details the bizarre relationship of an American widower (Marlon Brando) and a young Parisian woman (Maria Schneider). The film caused much controversy for the so-called "butter scene," which is extremely tame by today's standards. Schneider, who claims she is still haunted by the scene, was quoted in the New York Post (July 23, 2007), claiming that the scene wasn't part of the original script: "The truth is it was Marlon who came up with the idea . . . I should have called my agent or had my lawyer come to the set because you can't force someone to do something that isn't in the script . . . I was crying real tears. I felt humiliated and, to be honest, I felt a little raped . . . Thankfully, there was just one take . . . I never use butter to cook anymore - only olive oil." According to a court in Bologna that banned the film: "Obscene content offensive to public decency . . . presented with obsessive self-indulgence, catering to the lowest instincts of the libido, dominated by the idea of stirring unchecked appetites for sexual pleasure, permeated by scurrilous language . . . accompanied off screen by sounds, sighs and shrieks of climax pleasure."

#03 - THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST [1988]

"I am here to set fire to the world!" Martin Scorsese directed this adaption of Nikos Kazantzakis' controversial 1953 novel that is notable for the scandal it caused as well as for its bizarre casting that included Willem Dafoe as Jesus, Barbara Hershey as Mary Magdalene, Harvey Keitel as Judas Iscariot, David Bowie as Pontius Pilate and Harry Dean Stanton as Paul. Numerous religious leaders throughout the United States organized protests against The Last Temptation of Christ (many of whom didn't bother to make an effort to watch the film!) and several Southern cities such as Savannah, Georgia, banned the film. In addition, Blockbuster Video initially refused to carry the title in its stores. Scorsese was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Director for his efforts (Barry Levinson ended up winning the award for Rain Man).

#02 - TITICUT FOLLIES [1967]

"Don't turn your back on this film . . . if you value your mind or your life." A fascinating (and extremely disturbing!) black and white documentary dealing with the mistreatment of patients at the Massachusetts Correctional Institution, a prison hospital for the criminally insane, Titicut Follies was banned in the United States after a ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court determined that the film violated the patients' right to privacy. However, many critics believed that the film was removed from circulation by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to protect its own reputation. Finally, in 1992, the film aired on PBS and is now widely available.

#01 - CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST [1980]

"Oh, good Lord! It's unbelievable. It's horrible. I can't understand the reason for such cruelty!" Directed by Italian filmmaker Ruggero Deodato and filmed in the Amazon Rainforest, Cannibal Holocaust was banned in many countries upon its initial release due to its graphic gore and sexual violence, as well as for several gruesome (and genuine!) animal slayings that appear in the film. Rumors also circulated that it was a snuff film (which at least proved to be untrue!). Countries that banned the movie at one time or another include Italy, New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, Burma, Norway, South Africa, Finland, Turkey, Singapore, Germany, Iran and Morocco. Believe it or not, Cannibal Holocaust remains banned in several countries to this day . . . "Man is omnipotent; nothing is impossible for him. What seemed like unthinkable undertakings yesterday are history today. The conquest of the moon for example: who really talks about it anymore? Today we are already on the threshold of conquering our galaxy, and in a not too distant tomorrow, we'll be considering the conquest of the universe, and yet man seems to ignore the fact that on this very planet there are still people living in the stone age and practicing cannibalism."

Japan's 10 funniest tech-related ads

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/041108-slideshow-japanese-tech-ads.html?ts0

Doing Nothing !

Have you ever tried to do nothing ? Seriously its overwhelming, sometimes when somebody ask me what were you doing ? I might reply nothing or may be nothing much. Another lie ! Our minds is made in such a way that we are always brooding on something. There's an old saying that empty mind is devil's playground. So we are afraid of silence and dark since our childhood but thats exactly how most of the universe is.

Yeah I know what the critics in you would say "doing nothing is still doing something because you are doing nothing". That's what I was telling you about, your brooding nature. From one thread of thought to another, we are still apes inside.

Try doing nothing: http://zenhabits.net/2007/03/the-art-of-doing-nothing/

Object Oriented World

This is the time when people are realizing that corporations are not citizens from heaven, but the sociopaths from one of those boring zombie movies, so our childhood hypnosis that our society is designed to help us have a good life is eeking away. With all this outsourcing and contract jobs, people are living in a “harvest and discard” world, where people are harvested and discarded, worse than "hire and fire". People are like vegetables grown to be eaten. One of my friend told me that corporations are like tress, yes the regular big green trees with vast number of branches. Monkeys sitting all over the place and if you are one of them then you can see farting asses on your top and heads at the bottom.

Anyway, I have vented away my anger and indeed that was a bit cynical view, additionally you always have an option to take the "blue pill". So I question myself what is this object oriented world from the perspective of computer software’s. It means making those piece of code follow the design pattern of our modern society making us believe that they its alive with the ultimate goal of establishing their own civilization devoid of human existence in the year 2907. Common its not a piece of science fiction anyway what are we bio processors ~ 10^50 GHZ with a matching amount of memory and other peripherals. Yes we our all different, in others words we all have different hardware. All our imaginations are borrowed like those object oriented design patterns. Each company worth its salt promotes its own design pattern (think about them as today’s babies but responsible citizen of year 2907) in already extremely complicated and messy OO world. At this point you might remember about your right to disagree and nail me down, but this is the long-term view of the corporate world. Unfortunately, at least passively you are another building brick of this corporate jungle, putting everything you got to build their dreams. Good Luck!